gh-144846: make Element tag positional-only

[NekoAsakura]

Make tag positional-only in xml.etree.ElementTree.Element.__init__ to match the C accelerator.

The C implementation (_elementtree.Element) uses PyArg_ParseTuple, which inherently makes tag positional-only. The Python fallback used def __init__(self, tag, attrib={}, **extra): which allowed tag as a keyword argument. This inconsistency meant Element(tag="foo") worked only when the C accelerator was unavailable.

Same pattern as gh-144270 (SubElement).

Fix: add / after tag → def __init__(self, tag, /, attrib={}, **extra):

Changes

• Lib/xml/etree/ElementTree.py: add / to Element.__init__ signature
• Lib/test/test_xml_etree.py: add test_element_init covering positional-only enforcement, keyword attrib, and kwargs-as-XML-attributes parity
• Doc/library/xml.etree.elementtree.rst: update signature and add versionchanged:: 3.15

• Issue: Element.__init__ tag parameter has positional-only inconsistency #144846

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--144876.org.readthedocs.build/

[bedevere-app]

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the skip news label instead.

[NekoAsakura]

@bkap123 cheers for the review. While I'm at it, do I need to make the same change over on #144845 (the SubElement one) as well, or is that alright as is?

[aisk]

This PR changes the behavior of the public APIs and may affect users' code, so a news entry is required. #144845 is the same.

[NekoAsakura]

Thanks for the reminder! I've added news entries to both PRs.

[brijkapadia]

@bkap123 cheers for the review. While I'm at it, do I need to make the same change over on #144845 (the SubElement one) as well, or is that alright as is?

Left small suggestion

[serhiy-storchaka]

LGTM. 👍

[serhiy-storchaka]

Suggested change

	.. versionchanged:: 3.15
	.. versionchanged:: next

[serhiy-storchaka]

Maybe test also the attribute name 'attrib'?

[NekoAsakura]

Closing in favour of #144845, which already includes this change.