[2026-01-26] Incident Thread #185377
Replies: 8 comments
-
UpdateWe've applied a mitigation to unblock running Actions. A regression occurred for Windows runners in public repositories which caused Actions workflows to fail. A mitigation is in place and customers should expect to see resolution soon. If you have a failing Actions workflow on a Windows runner, please retry and it is likely to work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateMitigation for failing GitHub Actions jobs on 4-Core Windows runners is still being mitigated. You should start to see more runs succeeding. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateRollback has been completed, but we are still seeing failures on about 11% of GitHub Actions runs on 4 Core Windows runners in public repositories. If your workflow fails to start, try re-running and it is likely to work a second time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateWe're continuing to investigate failures in GitHub Actions 4 Core Windows runners in public repositories. If you have a failing GitHub Actions run, please retry it and it is likely to succeed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateOur investigation into GitHub Actions 4 Core Windows runner failures in public repositories is ongoing. If you have a failing GitHub Actions run, please retry it and it is likely to succeed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
UpdateAt 23:45 UTC we applied a mitigation to take remaining impacted capacity offline and are seeing improvement. We will update again once we've confirmed the issue is resolved. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Incident ResolvedThis incident has been resolved. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Incident SummaryOn Jan 26, 2026, from approximately 14:03 UTC to 23:42 UTC, GitHub Actions experienced job failures on some Windows standard hosted runners. This was caused by a configuration difference in a new Windows runner type that caused the expected D: drive to be missing. About 2.5% of all Windows standard runners jobs were impacted. Re-run of failed workflows had a high chance of succeeding given the limited rollout of the change. The job failures were mitigated by rolling back the affected configuration and removing the provisioned runners that had this configuration. To reduce the chance of recurrence, we are expanding runner telemetry and improving validation of runner configuration changes. We are also evaluating options to accelerate the mitigation time of any similar future events. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
❗ An incident has been declared:
Regression in windows runners for public repositories
Subscribe to this Discussion for updates on this incident. Please upvote or emoji react instead of commenting +1 on the Discussion to avoid overwhelming the thread. Any account guidance specific to this incident will be shared in thread and on the Incident Status Page.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions